The course concerns the organization of Italians Regions with particular attention to the revision of the Title V of the Constitution and the most recent reforms.
teacher profile teaching materials
Parte generale:
1) Antonio D'Atena, Diritto Regionale, Giappichelli, Torino, u.e.
2) Sandro Staiano, Costituzione italiana: articolo 5, Carocci, Roma, 2017
Parte speciale:
Gennaro Ferraiuolo, Costituzione Federalismo Secessione. Un itinerario, Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli, 2016
Ai soli studenti frequentanti sarà distribuito ulteriore materiale di approfondimento collegato agli argomenti trattati nel corso (sentenze, saggi critici, documentazione di carattere istituzionale, bibliografia specifica).
Mutuazione: 21810011 DIRITTO REGIONALE in Scienze politiche per il governo e l'amministrazione L-36 N0 (A-Z) ALIBERTI CRISTIANO
Programme
The course concerns the organization of Italians Regions with particular attention to the revision of the Title V of the Constitution and the most recent reforms.Core Documentation
Programma studenti frequentanti e non frequentantiParte generale:
1) Antonio D'Atena, Diritto Regionale, Giappichelli, Torino, u.e.
2) Sandro Staiano, Costituzione italiana: articolo 5, Carocci, Roma, 2017
Parte speciale:
Gennaro Ferraiuolo, Costituzione Federalismo Secessione. Un itinerario, Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli, 2016
Ai soli studenti frequentanti sarà distribuito ulteriore materiale di approfondimento collegato agli argomenti trattati nel corso (sentenze, saggi critici, documentazione di carattere istituzionale, bibliografia specifica).
Type of delivery of the course
Limited to the second semester of a.a. 2019/2020 will take place in on line modeAttendance
frequency is optionalType of evaluation
Oral examination concerning the whole program. Limited to the summer session 2019/2020 the oral examination will take place in on line mode This examination aims to verify the student ability to sum up and communicate information, to think critically and to use the appropriate juridical terms. The test consists of three or more questions aimed at assessing the learning outcome and the grades will be decided on the basis of the following criteria: less than 18/30: the student does not have a sufficient level of knowledge and it corresponds to a fail. 18-20/30: the student has acquired a bare minimum level of knowledge 21-23/30: the student has acquired a sufficient level of knowledge and the ability to understand notions and institutions of public law 24-26/30: the student has acquired a good level of knowledge and the ability to understand notions and institutions of public law 27-29/30 the student has acquired a very good level of knowledge and the ability to understand notions and institutions of public law as well as being able to think critically and communicate effectively 30-30 cum laude: the student has acquired an excellent level of knowledge and the capacity to understand notions and institutions of public law as well as having excellent communications skills and the ability to think critically.