Urban transformation - the course area of interest - is faced in a way to convey to the students the most suitable attitudes and postures, excluding final and preordained solutions. The course aims to convey the skill to identify the policies in action in the urban transformations and how they shape the contemporary city. Identify means acquire the skill to distinguish the policies in elements, actors and actions. The students will face the instruments and the operative methods usually employed for the policies implementation; they will learn to build, with different way to examine in depth the specific policies addressed to the theme of transformation, limited to some selected themes: sharing, habitability, density/intensity.
teacher profile teaching materials
Part one faces the needs stemming from local contexts, the way they are detected and acknowledged within welfare and urban regulation policies, since long term provisional models are currently denied by new environmental emergencies, immigration, stagflation, and other largely unpredictable circumstances.
Part two is faced with territorial policies of the European Union and of the member countries. Such approach helps revisit the wide range of Italian urban and territorial policies with particular regard to supra-local governance and urban regeneration issues.
Part three deals with the transformation scenarios that await Rome's metropolitan city and their effects on territorial governance, focusing on a case study falling under the jurisdiction of different authorities, marked by complex environmental, settlement and production problems disputed between different uses and utilities and general and sectoral tools.
Testi obbligatori
• Calzolari V., Storia e Natura come sistema, Argos, 1997.
• Hall P., Good cities, better lives : how Europe discovered the lost art of urbanism, London New York, Routledge, 2013.
• Insolera I., Roma moderna, Einaudi, Torino, 1962.
• Palazzo A.L. (a cura di), Campagne urbane. Paesaggi in trasformazione nell’area romana, Gangemi, Roma, 2005.
Approfondimenti
Governo dei processi
Battaglini E., La negozialità territoriale dell’innovazione nell’era digitale. Generatività sociale come nuova prospettiva interpretativa?, Annali della Fondazione Di Vittorio, 2019.
Calafati A., Economie in cerca di città, Donzelli 2009.
Caroli M.G., Prezioso M., Roma metropolitana. Prospettive regionali e ipotesi cross-border d'area vasta, Franco Angeli, 2016.
MIT, Dieci anni di governo delle complessità territoriali, 2008.
Sennett R., Insieme. Rituali, piaceri, politiche della collaborazione, Feltrinelli, 2012. L E X I T Y
Disciplina degli assetti
Aristone O., Palazzo A.L. (a cura di), Forme del Periurbano. Suoli, usi, vocazioni, “Urbanistica Informazioni”, n. 269-270 e n. 271.
Aristone O., Palazzo A.L., Né città né campagna. La nuova “Forma Città”, “Agriregionieuropa”, anno 12, n. 44, Mar 2016, pp. 7-9.
Cao U., Il progetto della densità, “EcoWebTown”, n. 9, 2011.
Duany A. (2002), Introduction to the Special Issue: The Transect, Journal of Urban Design, 7:3, 251-260.
Gabellini P., Grandi questioni e rappresentazioni della città, “Urbanistica”, n. 156, 2016.
Gambino R., La Convenzione europea del Paesaggio (CEP): dall’osservazione all’attuazione (datt.), ottobre 2015.
Palazzo A.L., Citta, spazio e tempo. Traiettorie del progetto, “EcoWebTown”, n. 17, 2017.
Russo M., Un nuovo orizzonte territoriale per il progetto urbanistico, “Urbanistica”, n. 156, 2016.
Secchi B., Analisi territoriale, in Secchi B., Un progetto per l’urbanistica, Laterza, 1989.
Secchi B., Attraversare il tempo, in Secchi B., Prima lezione di urbanistica, Laterza, 2004.
Critica della ragion pratica
Hölzer C., Hundt T., Lüke C., Hamm O.G., Riverscapes. Designing urban embankments, Birkhäuser Verlag, 2008.
Otto B., Mc Cormick K., Leccese M, Ecological Riverfront Design. Restoring Rivers, Connecting Communities, American Planning Association, 2014.
Programme
The aim of the course is to provide students with the conceptual and methodological tools to read, interpret and address governance schemes within urban and territorial transformations, where decision-making is called upon to cope with manifold proposals in a context full of regulations and diverging actors and interests.Part one faces the needs stemming from local contexts, the way they are detected and acknowledged within welfare and urban regulation policies, since long term provisional models are currently denied by new environmental emergencies, immigration, stagflation, and other largely unpredictable circumstances.
Part two is faced with territorial policies of the European Union and of the member countries. Such approach helps revisit the wide range of Italian urban and territorial policies with particular regard to supra-local governance and urban regeneration issues.
Part three deals with the transformation scenarios that await Rome's metropolitan city and their effects on territorial governance, focusing on a case study falling under the jurisdiction of different authorities, marked by complex environmental, settlement and production problems disputed between different uses and utilities and general and sectoral tools.
Core Documentation
Riferimenti bibliograficiTesti obbligatori
• Calzolari V., Storia e Natura come sistema, Argos, 1997.
• Hall P., Good cities, better lives : how Europe discovered the lost art of urbanism, London New York, Routledge, 2013.
• Insolera I., Roma moderna, Einaudi, Torino, 1962.
• Palazzo A.L. (a cura di), Campagne urbane. Paesaggi in trasformazione nell’area romana, Gangemi, Roma, 2005.
Approfondimenti
Governo dei processi
Battaglini E., La negozialità territoriale dell’innovazione nell’era digitale. Generatività sociale come nuova prospettiva interpretativa?, Annali della Fondazione Di Vittorio, 2019.
Calafati A., Economie in cerca di città, Donzelli 2009.
Caroli M.G., Prezioso M., Roma metropolitana. Prospettive regionali e ipotesi cross-border d'area vasta, Franco Angeli, 2016.
MIT, Dieci anni di governo delle complessità territoriali, 2008.
Sennett R., Insieme. Rituali, piaceri, politiche della collaborazione, Feltrinelli, 2012. L E X I T Y
Disciplina degli assetti
Aristone O., Palazzo A.L. (a cura di), Forme del Periurbano. Suoli, usi, vocazioni, “Urbanistica Informazioni”, n. 269-270 e n. 271.
Aristone O., Palazzo A.L., Né città né campagna. La nuova “Forma Città”, “Agriregionieuropa”, anno 12, n. 44, Mar 2016, pp. 7-9.
Cao U., Il progetto della densità, “EcoWebTown”, n. 9, 2011.
Duany A. (2002), Introduction to the Special Issue: The Transect, Journal of Urban Design, 7:3, 251-260.
Gabellini P., Grandi questioni e rappresentazioni della città, “Urbanistica”, n. 156, 2016.
Gambino R., La Convenzione europea del Paesaggio (CEP): dall’osservazione all’attuazione (datt.), ottobre 2015.
Palazzo A.L., Citta, spazio e tempo. Traiettorie del progetto, “EcoWebTown”, n. 17, 2017.
Russo M., Un nuovo orizzonte territoriale per il progetto urbanistico, “Urbanistica”, n. 156, 2016.
Secchi B., Analisi territoriale, in Secchi B., Un progetto per l’urbanistica, Laterza, 1989.
Secchi B., Attraversare il tempo, in Secchi B., Prima lezione di urbanistica, Laterza, 2004.
Critica della ragion pratica
Hölzer C., Hundt T., Lüke C., Hamm O.G., Riverscapes. Designing urban embankments, Birkhäuser Verlag, 2008.
Otto B., Mc Cormick K., Leccese M, Ecological Riverfront Design. Restoring Rivers, Connecting Communities, American Planning Association, 2014.
Type of delivery of the course
The subdivision of the module into didactic units makes it possible to check students' commitment and participation in carrying out the work. Therefore, the methodology consists of: frontal lectures, seminars with experts, teamwork aimed at critical readings commented in the classroom and at deepening ospontaneous and institutional dynamics occurring in the target area, on site visits. Attendance of the course is mandatory. In the event of an extension of the health emergency from COVID-19, all the provisions governing the methods of carrying out the didactic activities and students' assessment will be implemented. in particular, the following methods will be followed: oral exam interview.Type of evaluation
The final evaluation is related to the results achieved through the activities carried out during the year and to the ability to argue theoretical and methodological contents, with reference to exercises and seminars held during the year and to the recommended bibliography.